WELCOME TO BONDLADYS CORNER...WE CARRY ON HER CUSTOM OF MAKING THIS SITE YOUR 24 HOUR A DAY IRAQ NEWS ARTICLE SOURCE

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONTINUED SUPPORT OF OUR LADY.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Parliament decision of (date): fear appeal on election law (PFP)

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

dealerdean


ADMINISTRATOR
ADMINISTRATOR





Baghdad-urrunaga



Confirmed the decision of the House Greg that the election law could be challenged because the proposed Act.



He said to (time) on (the election law could be challenged because the proposed Act and wants contest will enter the country in a maze of political, constitutional and will throw him into the unknown).



Legal expert Amanda confirmed the existence of problems in the election law, if challenged, he would rebut and this may cause its cancellation.



Tamimi said in a statement today that (each proposal is vetoed election law was a proposal and not a Bill, and earlier decisions of the Federal Court overturned laws that began to form and has not been contradicted by the proposals in the form of draft laws with the laws of the Council of Ministers or the President of the Republic, and for that reason this is the first point that may be present when the challenged law).



He said (there are problems in the law, for example, increase the number of seats for minorities quota to more than eight, and kept the number when 8 and did not take into account the increase, as the Constitution provides, in article 49 each 100,000 of one candidate, but the case remains what it was little increase does not fit with this number). Added (so if one stabbing, article 93 of the Constitution entitles everyone to a political or civil society organizations challenging the law, if the law is challenged, it will invalidate the existence of these problems).



Tamimi said (even if the elections were held, and may be challenged then it will repeal the law and elections, because what is built on falsehood is false).



He stressed that (the Constitution is the highest legal reference no derogation, and when there is a violation it is at the heart of the Federal Court that interprets laws and consider whether their constitutionality).



[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]




Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum