Home
Critical of the Supreme Judicial Court of Cassation to refer members to the parliament for a vote
On: Tuesday 04/17/2012 10:29
Baghdad / Majid flood
is hoped that the House of Representatives voted today to the members of the Federal Cassation Court, despite the presence of intersections between the political blocs about them. Supreme Judicial Council, explained the mechanism in which the selection of judges of the Court of Cassation scheduled to vote on them today in the House of Representatives, saying that the success of the legislature in passing candidates will be the first since 2006.
A spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council Judge Abdul Sattar Bayraktar said in a statement singled out by the (long) "The nomination of judges of the Court of Cassation in the first pass through the gate of the Supreme Judicial Council to vote". While ruled out a coalition of state law to be voted to the members of the Federal Cassation Court, citing the existence of political differences around them.
Member of the coalition MP Ehsan Al-Awadi said in a telephone conversation with (range) yesterday, "made during the past period many of the names and they were more than 25 judges have been studied their files before the House of Representatives were excluded 3 of them," added Al-Awadi, "Yes .. there are differences remain existing between the political blocs on the candidates, "stressing that the choice will be based, as stated in the Constitution referring to the issue of balance.
He favored the al-Awadi, "to be voting on the stages," noting that this mechanism does not harm the fact that most of the members of the House of Representatives had not seen the files of candidates, likely to be voted on them during two or more. And local-Awadi to the inability to vote on the candidates in today's meeting.
for its part, considered the Iraqi List, that is to vote is settled before today's meeting, and that political parties have agreed, including more than a month on the candidates members of the Court of Cassation.
and MP Salem Daly in a telephone conversation with ( range) yesterday, "was agreed on all the candidates and there is no any kind of differences between the political blocs, criticizing what was said by a coalition of state law on the mechanism of voting in more than one session.
in the same context, it was considered that the Kurdistan Alliance, determined by vote whether or not today's meeting, saying the resolution Kurdistan to the order of vote. The spokesperson for the Alliance pro-Tayeb in a telephone conversation with (range) that the vote will not see any kind of quota system.
criticized Bayraktar refer the names of the judges of candidates to the parliament, although it is provided by the constitution, expressing his personal opinion that "the constitutional text which gave parliament the power to vote on the judges of discrimination affect the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers, and in this case would be a judge at the mercy of the political. "
and denied the spokesman of the Supreme Judicial Council subject nominated judges of the appeals court to file the balance that is being introduced in state institutions, "There objective conditions must conform with the persons to be appointed to this position. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
On: Tuesday 04/17/2012 10:29
Baghdad / Majid flood
is hoped that the House of Representatives voted today to the members of the Federal Cassation Court, despite the presence of intersections between the political blocs about them. Supreme Judicial Council, explained the mechanism in which the selection of judges of the Court of Cassation scheduled to vote on them today in the House of Representatives, saying that the success of the legislature in passing candidates will be the first since 2006.
A spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council Judge Abdul Sattar Bayraktar said in a statement singled out by the (long) "The nomination of judges of the Court of Cassation in the first pass through the gate of the Supreme Judicial Council to vote". While ruled out a coalition of state law to be voted to the members of the Federal Cassation Court, citing the existence of political differences around them.
Member of the coalition MP Ehsan Al-Awadi said in a telephone conversation with (range) yesterday, "made during the past period many of the names and they were more than 25 judges have been studied their files before the House of Representatives were excluded 3 of them," added Al-Awadi, "Yes .. there are differences remain existing between the political blocs on the candidates, "stressing that the choice will be based, as stated in the Constitution referring to the issue of balance.
He favored the al-Awadi, "to be voting on the stages," noting that this mechanism does not harm the fact that most of the members of the House of Representatives had not seen the files of candidates, likely to be voted on them during two or more. And local-Awadi to the inability to vote on the candidates in today's meeting.
for its part, considered the Iraqi List, that is to vote is settled before today's meeting, and that political parties have agreed, including more than a month on the candidates members of the Court of Cassation.
and MP Salem Daly in a telephone conversation with ( range) yesterday, "was agreed on all the candidates and there is no any kind of differences between the political blocs, criticizing what was said by a coalition of state law on the mechanism of voting in more than one session.
in the same context, it was considered that the Kurdistan Alliance, determined by vote whether or not today's meeting, saying the resolution Kurdistan to the order of vote. The spokesperson for the Alliance pro-Tayeb in a telephone conversation with (range) that the vote will not see any kind of quota system.
criticized Bayraktar refer the names of the judges of candidates to the parliament, although it is provided by the constitution, expressing his personal opinion that "the constitutional text which gave parliament the power to vote on the judges of discrimination affect the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers, and in this case would be a judge at the mercy of the political. "
and denied the spokesman of the Supreme Judicial Council subject nominated judges of the appeals court to file the balance that is being introduced in state institutions, "There objective conditions must conform with the persons to be appointed to this position. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
