Home
The inclusion of four judges, candidates for membership of the Court of Cassation ablation procedures
By: management of the Centre
On: Wednesday 02/08/2012 11:40
Revealed the deputy of the State of Law Tuesday, for the inclusion of four judges who were nominated for membership of the Court discriminatory de-Baathification procedures, confirmed that they will be prompted with the presidency of the House of Representatives not to put names to vote for when replacing them.
It was supposed to vote in the House of Representatives hearing yesterday, which was not held due to lack of quorum of members of the Federal Court discriminatory.
A member of the Coalition on Alfalh, said that "four out of ten judges who are nominated for membership of the Federal Court of Cassation need to change the procedure because of their inclusion, accountability and justice law," noting that "candidates should apply to them all the legal conditions for membership."
He Alfalh that "the National Alliance will call for the need to check the names of candidates prior to submission to a vote in the House of Representatives," adding that "covered by ablation procedures should be replaced by the Supreme Judicial Council which is responsible for nominating members of the Federal Court discriminatory."
Political differences still hinder the adoption of the law of the Federal Supreme Court despite the lapse of months to be discussed within the committees of the House of Representatives.
The Presidency has sent a bill last year, the Federal Supreme Court to the House of Representatives to approve the legislation, but al-Maliki called for in the legislation of the Council to wait five laws, including the law of the Federal Court.
According to the draft law of the Federal Court under discussion, it carried out the determination of the charges against the President and the Prime Minister, and the conflict of jurisdiction between the federal judiciary and the judicial institutions of the regions and governorates not organized into a Region, and the conflict of jurisdiction between the judicial institutions of the regions and governorates not organized into a Region.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
By: management of the Centre
On: Wednesday 02/08/2012 11:40
Revealed the deputy of the State of Law Tuesday, for the inclusion of four judges who were nominated for membership of the Court discriminatory de-Baathification procedures, confirmed that they will be prompted with the presidency of the House of Representatives not to put names to vote for when replacing them.
It was supposed to vote in the House of Representatives hearing yesterday, which was not held due to lack of quorum of members of the Federal Court discriminatory.
A member of the Coalition on Alfalh, said that "four out of ten judges who are nominated for membership of the Federal Court of Cassation need to change the procedure because of their inclusion, accountability and justice law," noting that "candidates should apply to them all the legal conditions for membership."
He Alfalh that "the National Alliance will call for the need to check the names of candidates prior to submission to a vote in the House of Representatives," adding that "covered by ablation procedures should be replaced by the Supreme Judicial Council which is responsible for nominating members of the Federal Court discriminatory."
Political differences still hinder the adoption of the law of the Federal Supreme Court despite the lapse of months to be discussed within the committees of the House of Representatives.
The Presidency has sent a bill last year, the Federal Supreme Court to the House of Representatives to approve the legislation, but al-Maliki called for in the legislation of the Council to wait five laws, including the law of the Federal Court.
According to the draft law of the Federal Court under discussion, it carried out the determination of the charges against the President and the Prime Minister, and the conflict of jurisdiction between the federal judiciary and the judicial institutions of the regions and governorates not organized into a Region, and the conflict of jurisdiction between the judicial institutions of the regions and governorates not organized into a Region.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
