Home
Sadrists: We will interrogate the prime minister if requested by the extension of the Americans
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 03:39
Send to a friend Print PDF
BAGHDAD: A Liberal parliamentary bloc of the Sadrist movement as you will be prompted to question Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki called for an extension if the U.S. presence in Iraq. A member of the House of Representatives on the mass of free Uday Awad's position is clear from the mass, and the question of extension of U.S. forces in Iraq.
"We refuse to allow occupation forces to stay another term in Iraq," noting that this position is the position of my people, not only the position of the Sadrist bloc.
Awad noted that "any government body calls for extension Snstjoppea in Parliament including the Prime Minister."
Meanwhile, the renewed political body of the Sadrist movement, on Tuesday, refusing to extend the stay of U.S. forces in Iraq after the end of the year and under any pretext or justification, criticizing what it called "misrepresentations, and Bid," the firm position of those forces.
The head of the political Karar al-Khafaji, said in a statement issued yesterday and got "long", a copy of "The body position of the American occupation clear and consistent," he rejected the Commission to extend the survival of those forces at all after the end of the year 2011, and under any pretext or justification, Khafaji said that the political body in the off position to refuse to extend the survival of the occupier of the premises and legal legitimacy and popularity, at the same time criticizing the misrepresentations, and bid on the position of the Sadr movement's firm rejection of the extension to the survival of the occupation forces, the statement said.
The MP for the Liberal block of the Sadrist movement have Uday Awad pointed to the possibility of approval of current U.S. forces to stay on after the year 2011.
The free block has, for the launch campaign for the prevention of U.S. forces and diplomats access to the building of the parliament, saying it had gathered so far the signing of a hundred deputies.
In turn, considered the leader of the coalition, the Iraqi deputy Haider Mulla that "the responsibility of security breaches in Iraq from the high rate of killings and terrorist bombings and breach of Iraq's borders is the responsibility of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, he served as commander of the armed forces in the country," pointing out that "any decision to withdraw U.S. troops in Iraq or the extension of survival must take into account the interests of the Iraqi people in the first place. "
The Mulla said in a statement to the news agency Kurdistan as "the endeavor of al-Maliki to expand Iranian influence in Iraq after the withdrawal of U.S. forces due by the end of this year, the Iraqi List, will stand against the withdrawal of those forces," stressing that "the silence of Maliki's Iranian violations and shelling the border areas of the territory Kurdistan, the best proof of his intention to expand Iranian influence in Iraq after the American withdrawal. "
The leadership in Iraq that "there are parties to an Iraqi view that, if the al-Maliki to extend the stay of American troops, it would be accused of keeping the country under the umbrella of the occupation," stressing that "this view is incorrect because Iraq with which several agreements of cooperation and common interests, the United States of America," noting "The list does not want to interfere in the issue of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq or not, so it does not claim any security positions in the Maliki government."
And oscillating statements politicians on the survival of part of the U.S. forces in the country after 2011, between acceptance and rejection or acceptance of shy, with the loading of some blocks blocks other decision-making responsibility, as a senior leader of the coalition of state law Hassan Sinead, 19, last June, that the survival or the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq is not, however, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, however, but the Council of Ministers of the political blocs, calling the last to take a unified position on this subject.
The Ministry of Interior, last week, the readiness of its forces to take over the security file after the American withdrawal end of the year, indicating that the presence of U.S. trainers in Iraq will be according to memorandums of understanding between the parties.
U.S. Undersecretary of the Ministry of the Interior Adnan al-Asadi said, "The Ministry has confirmed reports the readiness of its forces to take over security after the U.S. withdrawal," noting that "the commander of the armed forces, Nouri al-Maliki briefed on the reports as the Minister of the Interior acting and has ongoing meetings with its leaders."
The Asadi that "the Ministry of Interior does not need to have American troops but may need to exercise only," noting that "these exercises can occur through memoranda of understanding between Iraq and the United States and other countries for the training of intelligence and financial management."
The head of the House of Representatives Osama Najafi confirmed on 23 June last, that the stay of U.S. forces in Iraq depends on the agreement of the political blocs in accordance with the requirement of government.
Iraq has signed and the United States, in 2008, the Framework Agreement strategy to support the ministries and agencies of the Iraqi transition from the strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic, diplomatic, cultural and security, based on reducing the number of reconstruction teams in the provinces, as well as provide an important sustainable rule of law, including police development program and the completion of the coordination and supervision and the report of the Fund of Iraq relief and reconstruction.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington at the end of November 2008 that it should withdraw all U.S. forces from all territories and waters and airspace of Iraq no later than December 31 of this year, after it withdrew U.S. combat forces under the Convention of the cities, villages and towns Iraq June 30, 2009 in the past. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Wednesday, July 20, 2011 03:39
Send to a friend Print PDF
BAGHDAD: A Liberal parliamentary bloc of the Sadrist movement as you will be prompted to question Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki called for an extension if the U.S. presence in Iraq. A member of the House of Representatives on the mass of free Uday Awad's position is clear from the mass, and the question of extension of U.S. forces in Iraq.
"We refuse to allow occupation forces to stay another term in Iraq," noting that this position is the position of my people, not only the position of the Sadrist bloc.
Awad noted that "any government body calls for extension Snstjoppea in Parliament including the Prime Minister."
Meanwhile, the renewed political body of the Sadrist movement, on Tuesday, refusing to extend the stay of U.S. forces in Iraq after the end of the year and under any pretext or justification, criticizing what it called "misrepresentations, and Bid," the firm position of those forces.
The head of the political Karar al-Khafaji, said in a statement issued yesterday and got "long", a copy of "The body position of the American occupation clear and consistent," he rejected the Commission to extend the survival of those forces at all after the end of the year 2011, and under any pretext or justification, Khafaji said that the political body in the off position to refuse to extend the survival of the occupier of the premises and legal legitimacy and popularity, at the same time criticizing the misrepresentations, and bid on the position of the Sadr movement's firm rejection of the extension to the survival of the occupation forces, the statement said.
The MP for the Liberal block of the Sadrist movement have Uday Awad pointed to the possibility of approval of current U.S. forces to stay on after the year 2011.
The free block has, for the launch campaign for the prevention of U.S. forces and diplomats access to the building of the parliament, saying it had gathered so far the signing of a hundred deputies.
In turn, considered the leader of the coalition, the Iraqi deputy Haider Mulla that "the responsibility of security breaches in Iraq from the high rate of killings and terrorist bombings and breach of Iraq's borders is the responsibility of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, he served as commander of the armed forces in the country," pointing out that "any decision to withdraw U.S. troops in Iraq or the extension of survival must take into account the interests of the Iraqi people in the first place. "
The Mulla said in a statement to the news agency Kurdistan as "the endeavor of al-Maliki to expand Iranian influence in Iraq after the withdrawal of U.S. forces due by the end of this year, the Iraqi List, will stand against the withdrawal of those forces," stressing that "the silence of Maliki's Iranian violations and shelling the border areas of the territory Kurdistan, the best proof of his intention to expand Iranian influence in Iraq after the American withdrawal. "
The leadership in Iraq that "there are parties to an Iraqi view that, if the al-Maliki to extend the stay of American troops, it would be accused of keeping the country under the umbrella of the occupation," stressing that "this view is incorrect because Iraq with which several agreements of cooperation and common interests, the United States of America," noting "The list does not want to interfere in the issue of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq or not, so it does not claim any security positions in the Maliki government."
And oscillating statements politicians on the survival of part of the U.S. forces in the country after 2011, between acceptance and rejection or acceptance of shy, with the loading of some blocks blocks other decision-making responsibility, as a senior leader of the coalition of state law Hassan Sinead, 19, last June, that the survival or the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq is not, however, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, however, but the Council of Ministers of the political blocs, calling the last to take a unified position on this subject.
The Ministry of Interior, last week, the readiness of its forces to take over the security file after the American withdrawal end of the year, indicating that the presence of U.S. trainers in Iraq will be according to memorandums of understanding between the parties.
U.S. Undersecretary of the Ministry of the Interior Adnan al-Asadi said, "The Ministry has confirmed reports the readiness of its forces to take over security after the U.S. withdrawal," noting that "the commander of the armed forces, Nouri al-Maliki briefed on the reports as the Minister of the Interior acting and has ongoing meetings with its leaders."
The Asadi that "the Ministry of Interior does not need to have American troops but may need to exercise only," noting that "these exercises can occur through memoranda of understanding between Iraq and the United States and other countries for the training of intelligence and financial management."
The head of the House of Representatives Osama Najafi confirmed on 23 June last, that the stay of U.S. forces in Iraq depends on the agreement of the political blocs in accordance with the requirement of government.
Iraq has signed and the United States, in 2008, the Framework Agreement strategy to support the ministries and agencies of the Iraqi transition from the strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic, diplomatic, cultural and security, based on reducing the number of reconstruction teams in the provinces, as well as provide an important sustainable rule of law, including police development program and the completion of the coordination and supervision and the report of the Fund of Iraq relief and reconstruction.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington at the end of November 2008 that it should withdraw all U.S. forces from all territories and waters and airspace of Iraq no later than December 31 of this year, after it withdrew U.S. combat forces under the Convention of the cities, villages and towns Iraq June 30, 2009 in the past. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
