Home
Parliamentary consensus on the importance of U.S. troops out
Topic 6 has been read times
06/07/2011
Amid calls to take a unified political position regarding the withdrawal or extension
BAGHDAD - Alaa al-Tai
Shaimaa Rashid
Collect deputies from different blocks on the need to get out of U.S. troops and a commitment to the security agreement, which expires later this year. Deputies said in their statements, the "morning", to the importance that there be a political position, unified by the political blocs in this regard because the issue affects the interests of Iraq.
The leader of the Supreme Council, Dr Hamoudi said: "We require that they comply strictly to the Convention and we believe if the survival of American military forces, it will differ from the actual stay, if any .. you will not be physically located on the way, but there will be new to this Sgah survive."
He guessed that this is a crucial month for this thing clearly before the people and the blocks will be a final position in accordance with the justification that the government would table, if any.
It is said that Hammoudi said "morning" yesterday: "Mr. Hakim proposed the idea of convening a general meeting attended by all heads of blocs to discuss the rationale for the survival of U.S. forces in a realistic and scientific," noting that "put forward the initiative of convening a meeting of all heads of the blocks, intended to discuss the question of extending the survival of U.S. forces or its withdrawal, and in a transparent and public, because it discusses the idea of the survival of American military forces that it provides the justification for this thing clearly and must be convincing to the Iraqi people. "
He also predicted the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee in Parliament, said the initiative of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki visited the Parliament to present a detailed report on the readiness and capabilities of Iraqi security forces to hold the security file in the event of withdrawal of U.S. forces, noting that this offer is submitted some time ago and is hosted by the Prime Minister in Parliament.
This comes at a time MP for the Liberal bloc, Uday Awad for the collection of signatures of 100 members of Parliament urging the government to the departure of U.S. troops according to a security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington.
For his part, MP from the Sadrist bloc, Bahaa al: "The position of the cluster from the American forces to remain dismissive attitude, and adopt a mass withdrawal because the opinion of the parliament should represent the opinion of the Iraqi people."
Araji said that "there are several things that should be taken into account a general opposition to the stay of U.S. troops, it's the second experiment proved that the survival of forces U.S. military will not give us the freedom to arm the security establishments of interior and defense to keep a pretext for the survival of those forces in Iraq, either issue the most serious are:" Before deciding this matter and discuss the stay or withdraw should review the terms of the agreement with the U.S. side, especially as there are materials and items relating to the American party and the obligations have not been implemented .. The obligations relating to the Iraqi side has fully carried out and this makes us not trust with the American side, we learned that the political map, which includes the Arab countries and regional experiencing major changes in the region, so the Americans do not want to leave Iraq. "
Araji called the political blocs that have a unified position on this matter because it is in the interest of Iraq, noting that the position of the Sadrist movement of troops to stay is the position of refusing.
He stressed that the Prime Minister as leader of the armed forces confirmed that our security forces capable of maintaining order and internal security, but the fear of external aggression .. We need to protect the skies of Iraq and naval forces need to assign and support, noting "that he could address this issue by establishing treaties joint defense with the neighboring countries." As MP for the Kurdistan Alliance, Mohsen al-Sadoun, "The mass with the consensus of Iraq and decided by the leaders Politicians and the House of Representatives and will be discussed in this regard on the need for Iraq to a section of these forces. "Sadoun said:" The Parliament pending the report of the Prime Minister because it's about enterprise security .. and then we will have many questions, and we are with the consensus of Iraq that our decision will be part of national decision. "
He continued: "The readiness of the forces is not limited to maintaining security in the cities, but you Iraqi forces are ready to save the sovereignty of Iraq .. Is the Air Force ready to protect the skies of Iraq .. and naval force capable of protecting the waters of Iraq, and this is what is needed is to stand on the readiness of our security to develop a unified national position. "
For his part, said a member of the security and defense committee and the representative of the Iraqi List, the appearance of al-Janabi: "We are against the extension of U.S. military forces to remain, and must be adhered to the security agreement signed between the Iraqi and U.S. sides, which provides the exit of the military end of the year 2011."
He said al-Janabi: "In the case of a different opinion of the government, shall the Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki informed the Parliament about the readiness of the security ministries and their ability to save the border and internal security from U.S. forces, and this is what is missing so far, and we hope the Prime Minister that shows in his report to the parliament during hosted by the readiness of security forces to maintain security. "He added," We in the Commission on Security and Defense We have no knowledge about the capabilities of our military and security services and intelligence to save the system, "he says.
He also noted al-Janabi, said members of the Iraqi List, with the security agreement in because everything that happens in the country now is to do the occupier, who gave way to many to intervene in the country's internal affairs and we are against the extension of survival. "The source said a senior American" morning "recently, he was to reach an agreement in principle to keep a limited force of the U.S. military to train Iraqi forces will be provided with weapons by Iraq. and tried to "morning" Contact-governmental sources is responsible to make sure this information, but these officials did not respond to communications or the phone is closed.
The source continued American: The Power Ltd. will be tied to the U.S. Embassy, regardless of whether or total withdrawal was decided to extend the stay of troops.
It is said that a meeting chaired by President Jalal Talabani held two weeks ago to discuss the U.S. military presence among other issues, but deciding the case was postponed to a later time.
Predicted Leon Panetta and U.S. Secretary of Defense's new, recently, to ask Iraq from Washington «on stage» to keep some troops after the deadline for their withdrawal at the end of 2011, however, a source close to the government confirmed »Sabah», that this case requires a decision by the by all the political blocs.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington on the end of November of 2008 that it should withdraw all U.S. forces from all territories and waters and airspace of Iraq no later than December 31 of this year. And had withdrawn U.S. combat forces under the Convention of the Cities and villages and towns of Iraq on 30 June 2009.
And Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki late last month his intention to invite the political blocs to hold a meeting soon to decide whether to stay or the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, despite his emphasis on not feeling worried after the withdrawal of these forces, while the announced political blocs agreed to meet Maliki's call for a meeting During the next few days to discuss the issue of the withdrawal or extension of U.S. troops to stay in the country, according to the statements of representatives of these blocks, the "morning."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Topic 6 has been read times
06/07/2011
Amid calls to take a unified political position regarding the withdrawal or extension
BAGHDAD - Alaa al-Tai
Shaimaa Rashid
Collect deputies from different blocks on the need to get out of U.S. troops and a commitment to the security agreement, which expires later this year. Deputies said in their statements, the "morning", to the importance that there be a political position, unified by the political blocs in this regard because the issue affects the interests of Iraq.
The leader of the Supreme Council, Dr Hamoudi said: "We require that they comply strictly to the Convention and we believe if the survival of American military forces, it will differ from the actual stay, if any .. you will not be physically located on the way, but there will be new to this Sgah survive."
He guessed that this is a crucial month for this thing clearly before the people and the blocks will be a final position in accordance with the justification that the government would table, if any.
It is said that Hammoudi said "morning" yesterday: "Mr. Hakim proposed the idea of convening a general meeting attended by all heads of blocs to discuss the rationale for the survival of U.S. forces in a realistic and scientific," noting that "put forward the initiative of convening a meeting of all heads of the blocks, intended to discuss the question of extending the survival of U.S. forces or its withdrawal, and in a transparent and public, because it discusses the idea of the survival of American military forces that it provides the justification for this thing clearly and must be convincing to the Iraqi people. "
He also predicted the Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee in Parliament, said the initiative of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki visited the Parliament to present a detailed report on the readiness and capabilities of Iraqi security forces to hold the security file in the event of withdrawal of U.S. forces, noting that this offer is submitted some time ago and is hosted by the Prime Minister in Parliament.
This comes at a time MP for the Liberal bloc, Uday Awad for the collection of signatures of 100 members of Parliament urging the government to the departure of U.S. troops according to a security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington.
For his part, MP from the Sadrist bloc, Bahaa al: "The position of the cluster from the American forces to remain dismissive attitude, and adopt a mass withdrawal because the opinion of the parliament should represent the opinion of the Iraqi people."
Araji said that "there are several things that should be taken into account a general opposition to the stay of U.S. troops, it's the second experiment proved that the survival of forces U.S. military will not give us the freedom to arm the security establishments of interior and defense to keep a pretext for the survival of those forces in Iraq, either issue the most serious are:" Before deciding this matter and discuss the stay or withdraw should review the terms of the agreement with the U.S. side, especially as there are materials and items relating to the American party and the obligations have not been implemented .. The obligations relating to the Iraqi side has fully carried out and this makes us not trust with the American side, we learned that the political map, which includes the Arab countries and regional experiencing major changes in the region, so the Americans do not want to leave Iraq. "
Araji called the political blocs that have a unified position on this matter because it is in the interest of Iraq, noting that the position of the Sadrist movement of troops to stay is the position of refusing.
He stressed that the Prime Minister as leader of the armed forces confirmed that our security forces capable of maintaining order and internal security, but the fear of external aggression .. We need to protect the skies of Iraq and naval forces need to assign and support, noting "that he could address this issue by establishing treaties joint defense with the neighboring countries." As MP for the Kurdistan Alliance, Mohsen al-Sadoun, "The mass with the consensus of Iraq and decided by the leaders Politicians and the House of Representatives and will be discussed in this regard on the need for Iraq to a section of these forces. "Sadoun said:" The Parliament pending the report of the Prime Minister because it's about enterprise security .. and then we will have many questions, and we are with the consensus of Iraq that our decision will be part of national decision. "
He continued: "The readiness of the forces is not limited to maintaining security in the cities, but you Iraqi forces are ready to save the sovereignty of Iraq .. Is the Air Force ready to protect the skies of Iraq .. and naval force capable of protecting the waters of Iraq, and this is what is needed is to stand on the readiness of our security to develop a unified national position. "
For his part, said a member of the security and defense committee and the representative of the Iraqi List, the appearance of al-Janabi: "We are against the extension of U.S. military forces to remain, and must be adhered to the security agreement signed between the Iraqi and U.S. sides, which provides the exit of the military end of the year 2011."
He said al-Janabi: "In the case of a different opinion of the government, shall the Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki informed the Parliament about the readiness of the security ministries and their ability to save the border and internal security from U.S. forces, and this is what is missing so far, and we hope the Prime Minister that shows in his report to the parliament during hosted by the readiness of security forces to maintain security. "He added," We in the Commission on Security and Defense We have no knowledge about the capabilities of our military and security services and intelligence to save the system, "he says.
He also noted al-Janabi, said members of the Iraqi List, with the security agreement in because everything that happens in the country now is to do the occupier, who gave way to many to intervene in the country's internal affairs and we are against the extension of survival. "The source said a senior American" morning "recently, he was to reach an agreement in principle to keep a limited force of the U.S. military to train Iraqi forces will be provided with weapons by Iraq. and tried to "morning" Contact-governmental sources is responsible to make sure this information, but these officials did not respond to communications or the phone is closed.
The source continued American: The Power Ltd. will be tied to the U.S. Embassy, regardless of whether or total withdrawal was decided to extend the stay of troops.
It is said that a meeting chaired by President Jalal Talabani held two weeks ago to discuss the U.S. military presence among other issues, but deciding the case was postponed to a later time.
Predicted Leon Panetta and U.S. Secretary of Defense's new, recently, to ask Iraq from Washington «on stage» to keep some troops after the deadline for their withdrawal at the end of 2011, however, a source close to the government confirmed »Sabah», that this case requires a decision by the by all the political blocs.
Under the security agreement signed between Baghdad and Washington on the end of November of 2008 that it should withdraw all U.S. forces from all territories and waters and airspace of Iraq no later than December 31 of this year. And had withdrawn U.S. combat forces under the Convention of the Cities and villages and towns of Iraq on 30 June 2009.
And Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki late last month his intention to invite the political blocs to hold a meeting soon to decide whether to stay or the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, despite his emphasis on not feeling worried after the withdrawal of these forces, while the announced political blocs agreed to meet Maliki's call for a meeting During the next few days to discuss the issue of the withdrawal or extension of U.S. troops to stay in the country, according to the statements of representatives of these blocks, the "morning."
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
