Home
Reveal the future of Iraq: the Pentagon who "stole" Iraq's money .. Ate $ 9 billion U.S. organizations authorized by Baghdad without control since 2004
25/1/2012 0:00
"First episode"
Future of Iraq / serenity behind
when he entered the United States to Iraq in the spring of 2003, embarked on the implementation of hundreds of thousands of projects for the rehabilitation of government buildings and build new ones as centers police, hospitals, prisons, government departments and repair of transmission lines, water and electricity, so that the lines of local contractors seemed an almost the phenomenon of avoiding the phenomenon of wanting to volunteer on the lines of "National Guard" time, or to the lines of the disbanded Iraqi army ranks!! For a grant of (50) dollars instead of all state employees the time, as well as grants to civil society organizations and tasks of relief and the training of cadres, etc., and most likely the time (and perhaps even the preparation of this report), that the money made by the U.S. military is a gift and Ashentunaih in the context of campaign's efforts to build democracy in the country and rebuild!!. And found documents obtained by (the future of Iraq), a report by the inspector general for the U.S. and correspondence with the United Nations - Headquarters, as well as correspondence between BSA and the Integrity Commission representative.
(lost your money, O Saber), if a country estate his family on the night of a dark, do not knew the way to the water Vestrahawwa and knew the way back to (the predecessor who shawl), funds the Iraqi enshrined in the former system of service and secure its arsenal security, military, and the payment of bribes and coupons for politicians, writers and Arab organizations and the world, and denied the owner the hungry, and the rest of that money was lost in the corridors of the Pentagon and their support for reconstruction, military and civilian, laying waste $ 17 billion, was unaccounted for and why the conclusions of the Special Inspector General for the file of the reconstruction of Iraq (Stuart W. Brown, Jr.) in an official memorandum addressed to the Minister of Defense on 27 / July 2010, that "the weaknesses in financial control and management made by the Ministry of Defense [U.S.] is not able properly to identify the aspects of exchange of $ 8.7 billion out of 9.1 billion dollars from the funds of the Development Fund for Iraq. " How did the story after the invasion of Iraq, and the formation of the authority CPA as the de facto ruler of the country, and has broad powers in the disbursement of funds and management services and security, so since January 2004 received the Pentagon's 9.1 billion dollars from the Development Fund for Iraq, in the original as follows according to the statement in the official documents the U.S.: (sales and exports of oil products and natural gas, and the surplus money from the food for oil, Iraqi assets frozen), and the fund was established by the Director of the Coalition Provisional Authority in May 2003, ie after the announcement of President Bush's military operations in Iraq, admitted to the Fund by the UN resolution number 1843 on 22 May of the same year, and select the UN resolution (object exchange), which does not comply, the U.S. Defense Department has not held accountable by the negligent or instigators in that: the humanitarian needs of the Iraqi people, (re the economic structure and repair of infrastructure, continued disarmament, the cost of the civil administration of Iraq , for the benefit of the Iraqi society) and the last paragraph was loose and inaccurate did not specify the doors cation exchange. and after that came the Coalition Provisional Authority, and the formation of the Iraqi government the first in June 2004, authorized the government of Baghdad, the U.S. government of running the fund for Iraq's development for three years earlier, uncontrollably!!, until the withdrawal of the authorization Maliki's government was the first in the December 31, 2007. Remarkably, the Inspector General Stuart, someone bug that did not Ttdarkh the United States as a government full civil and institutions operate professionally, as opposed to the Government of Iraq that were not the institutionalization of clear or specialized regulators. Stewart says on 24/4/2010, "about the weaknesses in determining the Army Corps of Engineers U.S. responsibility in the exchange aspects of the Development Fund for Iraq funds, pay bills and fund development projects is paid." acknowledges Stuart unequivocally neglect, which occurred when the Pentagon, in that he did not follow and perhaps neglected (on purpose) Follow-up accounts and funds, and recognizes the text, "The reports indicated the audit completed for the Iraqi government that U.S. government agencies did not maintain a database of complete and accurate reconstruction contracts awarded by the Coalition Provisional Authority." This means that the corner of the criminal in such a case of financial corruption available an intention prior to disguise the information intentionally to confuse the audit process Augolha impossible in the absence of documents and clear. funny thing about it, too, that the Iraqi authorities were committed according to the documents we are reviewing, according to the transparency of the handling of financial and in order not to loss of money, the report of the Inspector General, Finance Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi in the government of Allawi, 2004, to open two accounts, namely the expense of the Iraqi Central Bank (main account) and calculate the Development Fund for Iraq, the sub (secondary account), and the latter is available for the use of U.S. government agencies with the consent of Baghdad, and it received U.S. Army Corps of Engineers about 1.3 of the main account, and 827.6 million from the sub-account, of course, since 2004 to sever the relationship in 2007. and complex financial statements, it also became apparent that the U.S. Defense Department has received funds from three other sources: the conversion $ 6.6 billion from the Controller of the Coalition Provisional Authority to the Support Group for the Central District (the government military mission management and control of Iraqi funds, and in March 2008 was re-$ 24.5 million of remaining funds to Baghdad, and in addition to that provided interim Iraqi government $ 136 million in 2004 and 2005 from the central bank for the Emergency Response Program Military American, also provided the government itself later in the $ 270 million in 2008 to fund the program itself. and therefore the size of the amounts from 2004 to 2008 amounted to 9,149,5 billion. deliberate neglect and even checks the condition of the charge, which must be directed to the American administration and the Pentagon on the loss of Iraqi funds, documents say that since June 2004 until December 2007 granted Iraqi Minister of Finance authority to the Defense Department to monitor the financial performance and its emphasis. Based on this and to determine the parties controlling the disbursement and the beneficiary directly. the five American organizations government-Pentagon participated in the responsibility, namely: Project and Contracting Office in the U.S. military in Iraq and Multinational Corps in Iraq, Central Command, U.S. Army, Air Force, and Joint Command of the contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is noteworthy that the latter organization was to have the power to oversee a full After ended the authority of the U.S. Army direct the money, and the irony terrible it is - according to the Inspector General U.S. - it "has never received funds from the Development Fund or run." Despite that, the Iraqi Minister of Finance has agreed to manage this organization specifically to extend the mission until 31 December 2007, and it should not be awarded any new contracts, and that he must convert the remaining funds to (the account of President.) recognized in the report, which took place in the 40-page, recognizes the special inspector general file of the reconstruction of Iraq (Stuart W. Brown, Jr.), and the text to " demonstrated the potential risks arising from the lack of procedures for financial control and sound management of such funds, in particular the activities of the Under-payment in the province of south-central Iraq (Baghdad and its environs), and the paying agents and the Director of the accounts of the Development Fund for Iraq were not able properly to identify the aspects of exchange 96, $ 6 million in cash and receipts of and prove the correctness, so the inspector's criminal investigation into the use of these funds resulted in the condemnation of 8 employees in the Coalition Provisional Authority and the Ministry of Defence on charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering, and 7.8 million in fines and sources of compensation. impeachment Based on a thorough investigation and accurately and literally, by the Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, concluded that "weaknesses in financial control made the Ministry of Defense is able to identify the aspects of exchange $ 8.7 billion out of $ 9.1 billion from the funds of the Development Fund for Iraq, and it turned out that most of the organizations and the Ministry of Defence that received the money did not create the accounts needed to Ministry of Finance, is not set organization under the Ministry of Defense agent executive to manage the use of the money the Development Fund for Iraq. "stresses that" the imbalance in the control procedures have made the money likely to use inappropriate and the loss is discovered. " The report accuses a literally, "The Defense Department failed to implement directives in a timely manner, and most importantly it did not follow directions, and the organization and one of those organizations to establish the desired account, and therefore is not selected aspects of the nearly 96% of Iraq's money available to the Pentagon." follow tomorrow
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
