Home
State of Law: Law defining the mandates of the three presidencies "an abuse" of the Constitution A member of the House of Representatives for a coalition of state law Mohammed Saadoun Chihod enact a law defining the mandates of the three presidencies yesterday to "offending" the Constitution and the parliamentary system.
8/26/15
He Chihod it: in all parliamentary systems determine the presidency two sessions and leave the presidency of parliament and ministers without identification as well as the Iraqi constitution, noting that "the parliamentary system differs from the presidential system, on the grounds that the presidential system determines the state two sessions in a row and ideals of this America, and in the parliamentary system does not define the mandate of prime minister but remain open, for example, Britain, as is the case with Margaret Thatcher, which lasted for three consecutive sessions. "
He said: legislation defining the mandates of the three presidencies law falls within the laws improvised ill-considered, unfortunately, under the pretext of preventing dictatorship, a flimsy argument intended to dump the Constitution of the real content and rag, beaten and weakened, wondering said, "how there is a dictatorship in the presence of free, fair and democratic elections he said, adding that it was better for Parliament under the chairmanship of legislation important laws such as those related to services and job grades, investment, infrastructure and the economy. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
8/26/15
He Chihod it: in all parliamentary systems determine the presidency two sessions and leave the presidency of parliament and ministers without identification as well as the Iraqi constitution, noting that "the parliamentary system differs from the presidential system, on the grounds that the presidential system determines the state two sessions in a row and ideals of this America, and in the parliamentary system does not define the mandate of prime minister but remain open, for example, Britain, as is the case with Margaret Thatcher, which lasted for three consecutive sessions. "
He said: legislation defining the mandates of the three presidencies law falls within the laws improvised ill-considered, unfortunately, under the pretext of preventing dictatorship, a flimsy argument intended to dump the Constitution of the real content and rag, beaten and weakened, wondering said, "how there is a dictatorship in the presence of free, fair and democratic elections he said, adding that it was better for Parliament under the chairmanship of legislation important laws such as those related to services and job grades, investment, infrastructure and the economy. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
