Plan A ... For all!
Author: Mohamed Abdul-Jabbar carp
12/30/2012 12:00 am
Are collapsed the Iraqi national project which we were talking about days the opposition as an alternative to the dictatorial regime backward?
appropriate to ask this question what the country is witnessing events and senior statesman described as "severe distress and many joints does not stand where only God tested his heart for the faith." Has missed discourse civil words politicians and supposed to be statesmen, and people returned to their identities Sub despite continuing Ngném Iraq, there is no longer talking about human rights and citizenship only when the intended meaning is much narrower.
difficult for national keen to answer yes to question above, because this means that the country is sliding into risk Mnhderha, as it is difficult for objective analyst say no, because the indicators suggest otherwise.
it may be appropriate to recall that what we are seeing now is the result of the first mistake was committed after the fall of the regime backward, While pioneers chose to establish alternative political system to have their project based on the components and not on the basis of citizenship and citizens. Even we are today talking about the Arab component and component Kurdish and Turkmen component and component Shiite and Sunni component and the Christian component and Sabean component. Nothing in this plug-citizens, but members do not play their role as active citizens, but to the extent insufficient minimum. And depicting the leaders of the ingredients that they can get their rights through deepening the concept of components, forgetting that the division of the pie on the basis of components leads to the loss of smaller components for the predominance of the biggest components. But why get a member of the Christian component if sharing between Christians and Muslims? And what do you get a member of the Kurdish component if sharing between Arabs and Kurds? And say the same thing about the rest of the names. Loss components will be an inverse relationship with size. The smaller the size of the component grew up losing. And vice versa.'s
no escape from this dangerous slider, but to return to the fundamentals of building a civil state, and I mean first and foremost citizenship. On the basis of citizenship is partnership and sharing, if true word in this area, the number of citizens, so the division then neutral fair, he will get every citizen to like what it gets any other citizen, taking into account the same eligibility and competence and experience and so on. Division here between citizens, a fair; and division there between components, which is fair.
might not be too late to what we say, and instead take a further step in the wrong way, which we started 10 years ago, why not take a first step in the right way, by correction, and I mean by building the state, and not the authorities and spheres of influence, the United Arab Emirates and to entrench the divide, and build a state based on citizenship and not on the basis of the components. Wants everyone from this step, you will not beat one-on-one, we are all both in the state of citizenship, not preferred for Arab or Muslim Kurdish or Shiite or Christian, Sunni or Turkmen, but good citizenship effective.
those is a plan. They plan valid for all. Nor يغرنكم other vanity!!.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]