Legal expert: the loss of a lawsuit against the Ministry of Oil and the Kurdistan region do not affect the Constitution
Said legal expert Tareq Harb, Sunday, that the loss of oil lawsuit brought by the oil ministry against the Kurdistan region do not affect the provisions of the Constitution, which identified the oil and extraction administration.
He said the war in a statement received news agency public opinion (and babysit), a copy of "His Excellency the region echoed by the media, because of the loss of the Ministry of Oil of the suit brought by the United States against the territory was inevitable for many reasons, including that there is an American party to the proceedings, a US company that Oil has bought the US and the elimination of the US gives the party a certain sanctity that the procedure is OK with the law as a general rule. "
He added that "all the conditions are bound to note that there are two things. First, this provision does not affect the provisions set by the Constitution for the ownership of oil and his administration and extraction started, and the second thing he did not need to apply the provisions of modulated Law No. 31 of 2015 on the employee or employees who were the cause in the establishment of this lawsuit without realizing what was explained previously, as this entails shortening them responsibility contained in this law, and they need to pay compensation for the damage that occurred, including expenses and wages, as they had to leave the issue as a matter of internal Iraqi and non-establishment of the lawsuit. "
And he pointed out that "the judiciary in the American proceedings does not recognize even the UN Security Council resolutions issued under Chapter VII, which are binding on all parties in the world, so the US President had issued an executive decree for the protection of Iraqi funds from the proceedings held before the US courts, and is considered Iraq's money included the state of emergency is not sufficient to Security Council resolutions did not issue this presidential decree, but stops after payment of $ 500 million from Iraq to America for an end to claims and lawsuits that what is stated in Law No. 7 of 2011 so stop the issuance of this US presidential decree since 2014. "
He explained that "all lawsuits filed in US courts to claim compensation for acts committed by soldiers or American contractors in Iraq in material compensation to Iraqis who have been affected by these incidents while eliminating the English will not issue issued the provisions of compensation millions of dollars to the Iraqis in such cases," referring to "The American justice shall be punished in such cases, non-compliance with the rules of engagement and open fire, which results in murder and this is what happened, for example, in a case that got the Eagles Square in 2007, as the court did not control for compensation for the Iraqis."
He said the "American justice's position is clear for claims and suits the special effects and enough to demonstrate that claim the effects of the Iraqi Jews that have been moved after the fall and what happened from re a lot of relics of the Americans was based on the realization of these Americans
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]