BAGHDAD / ... stressed the need for a legal expert vote one-third of the members of the House of Representatives to pass a Federal Court Act, "referring to" the interpretation of the Court on the constitutionality of the required majority of the votes of the members of the Parliament of adequate legislation to the new law of this court. "
He said the war in a statement "Eye Iraq News" received a copy of "The interpretation of the court depart from the constitutional right and spewed from interpretative payment, Article 92 of the Constitution, which defined the features of this law stipulates (Federal Supreme Court consists of whose number and manner of selection and work Court law passed by two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives) Thus, the majority rule of the Constitution this law makes it compulsory approval of two-thirds of members of parliament. "
And that "As the number of members of parliament, 328 members it must be approved by 220 members at least," adding that "the cause of stresses Constitution in the number of members required for the approval of the law of this arises from the position Alazky in the democratic system and its supreme in the political system as a Greatest rules and principles of the system and also an emerging and important to be entrusted to the Constitution Court. "
He explained that the war "Article 93 of the Constitution identified the jurisdiction of the Court to control the constitutionality of laws and regulations and to change the constitution and the separation in the issues that arise from the application of laws, decisions, regulations, instructions and procedures issued by the federal authority."
He said the legal expert as that of the jurisdiction of the Federal Court "Settling disputes that arise between the federal government and the regions, provinces and municipalities, and local administrations and to settle disputes that arise between the regions and the governorates and the separation in the accusations against the President and the Prime Minister and the Ministers and the ratification of the election results for the House of Representatives and Settling jurisdiction. "
He pointed out that "Article 52 said the court chapter in the jurisdiction of the appeal membership deputy health including note that it is concerned with the most serious and biggest and greatest issues and lawsuits and disputes and discounts in various walks of life of the rule and policy, management and economy and meeting the rights and duties and the demands and obligations and other dangerous things."
He said that "these things mentioned above and others require the Parliament Legal Committee parliamentary private further analysis and reasoning, investigation, survey and research and study and know-how and the novel in order to be the new Court Act legally represents the Iraqi legal system necklace note that the constitution stipulated that such a large majority, a two-thirds majority in issues less important and the seriousness of the lowest of them challenged the validity of the Attorney membership in accordance with Article 52 of the Constitution and legislation of the Federation Council Law in accordance with Article 65 of the Constitution. "
He pointed out the war to be "the general rule in the vote on laws and decisions issued by the Parliament is the majority after the check and that's where a quorum is achieved in the presence of more than half of the members of Parliament any presence of 165 deputies, considering that half of the members of 164 deputies, it means that the approval of the 83 Vice enough to issue the majority of laws and decisions. "
He argued that "in all cases, the judges of the Federal Supreme Court existing accomplished constitutional, legal and judicial and cultural heritage since 2005, the date of the establishment of the court and so today than proud of every owner of a national mind and the heart of the Iraqi called Bafilah the slaves, and proclaimed righteousness of the country and secure Mesopotamia and converted the land Lafratin."
The Federal Supreme Court confirmed last Thursday that the vote on the law must be two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives, the terms and the law in general, pointing out that going to mean another interpretation of the constitutional text empty of content.
The House Speaker Salim al-Jubouri said in a parliament session yesterday that the "project of the Federal Supreme Court Act is ready for a vote based on what was confirmed by the Legal Committee," adding that "the Presidency urges the House of Representatives to preserve the level of intensive attendance of the meetings," noting that "the presidency choose the right time to present the draft law to a vote ".anthy 1
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]