Is no longer a choice but to Europe and the West of relying on political and military power of the Shiites in Iran, Iraq and Syria (West classifies as well) and Lebanon (Hezbollah) to stop the threat of "jihadists" (Western expression) that threatens even the countries that supported them tactically such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
BAGHDAD / Obelisk: waiting strategy from Iraq in building bridges of trust between Washington and Tehran, lead to an end to the presence of Daash in Iraq and to reach a peaceful settlement in Syria, and to build a strong alliance against terrorist groups in the region and trapping terrorist Hawwadhanh concentrated in mostly in communities dominated by thought the extreme. Whatever sought certain countries such as the Gulf states, to delude the United States that the Shiite militant Hezbollah, but Washington is well aware that this disciplined groups to some extent can be directed because of her faith groups such as the factions popular crowd in Lebanon and other factions fighting in Iraq as a "terrorist" organizations dogmatic, absolute and responses to their references as they do not do any terrorist operation throughout the history of combat. Inevitably to Europe and the West is no longer rely on the political and military power of the Shiites in Iran, Iraq and Syria (West classifies as well) and Lebanon (Hezbollah) to stop the threat of "jihadists" (Western expression) that threatens even the countries that supported them tactically such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. And in front of this trend in the course of events and states seeking to confuse the interests of Iraq's relationship with both Iran and the United States, has accused Iran of trying to dominate Iraq as the United States accuses help Daash terrorist organization in Iraq.
The fact of the matter, that Iraq continues to receive support from both sides, despite the differences that appear from time to time about the policies and attitudes details.
It must be said that the Iranian-American competition for cooperation with Iraq, in the interest of the war on terrorism, a condition not to harm the independence of the Iraqi decision and sovereignty of the country.
Shows the height of the competition in the American retired Gen. Anthony Tata told in an interview with the "CNN" in that the reason for accepting the Iraqi forces to the presence of Iranian advisers on their side back to the development of the United States a lot of schedules and conditions before allowing the participation of its troops in the fighting, while the Iranians do not.
And what he said Tat true to a large extent, and that the United States if it wants to maintain its interests in Iraq, that is well aware that the consolidation of relations will not be throwing bombs on Daash but only through clarity in relations and translation hopes to the events on the ground.
It also said the United States should abandon its positions duplication, and to refrain from gaining the approval of the Gulf oil states on its relationship with other countries in the region account.
The writer speaks Ali Marid for duplication Arab deal to Iraq's relationship with Iran, while above the screams of Egypt and the Gulf states about what they call Iran's interference internal to their affairs, Petty tribal sectarianism do not find any derogatory in to intervene and negatively, and shameless affairs of Iraq, exhausted and Menhmk Bochers war against terrorism Aldaasha gangs.
In contrast, if the United States intervened in Iraq, it finds welcome them.
He was the supreme authority in Iraq, Mr. Ali al-Sistani said that the welcome assistance provided to Iraq in its war against al Daash, does not mean to dismiss the identity and independence of Iraqis, in an implicit response to the recent Iranian presidential adviser Ali Yonsei's remarks, in which he said Iraq is part of Iranian empire.
In fact, the supreme authority is not intended only Iran, but all countries must differentiate between helping Iraq and interference in its affairs.
The balance between Iran and the United States in Iraq, discloses Iraqi politicians believe that the statements of the interest of understanding establishing an Iranian American, and work to strengthen it because served Iraqi interests.
While hardly Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister, Bahaa al-Araji, the pivotal role of Iran in the war of terrorism, noting that it stood by Iraq and supported in addressing the totals terror, criticizing the positions that are critical of Iran's support for his country, says Iraqi Defense Minister Khaled al-Obeidi, said Iraq balances in relations between Washington and Tehran, praising the support of the United States to Iraq.
According to the British Guardian, Iran and the United States have common interests in Iraq, what should cooperate together and on a larger scale.
Suggesting researcher Abdul Salam Omran stated that hostility between Iran and the United States since the Iranian Revolution in 1979, leading to the crisis of the nuclear program, did not prevent the parties from Iraq quickly compatibility in service to their interests. "
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]